Four Corners Media is blog featuring a conservative perspective to public policy,politics,elected office,local government (Colorado & New Mexico) & elections. With some humor, wit and sharpened words, we'll feature commentary & punditry for our readers to enjoy. Jazzman3
Blog Search on 4C Media
Friday, July 17, 2009
Let's Rethink Healthcare Reform
I wanted to take a minute with you are share what is on my heart about healthcare reform. As most of you know, Congress is creating legislation on Healthcare Reform, which the President wants to bring to a vote before the August congressional recess. I think many would agree that we need to make some changes to the current arrangement that would make healthcare more accessible and more cost efficient. However, the legislation that is being rushed through (you might want to ask yourself, why the hurry!) will do neither. In fact, on page 16 of the house bill, there is a provision, that will make it illegal to carry private insurance. Do you want your current health insurance replaced by government health insurance which is being modeled after Medicaid? It will cost Trillions of dollars and the Congressional Budget Office has reported that they can't really even give an accurate estimate of the cost, because they haven't been given enough time or information to evaluate the legislation.
Healthcare is 1/7th of our economy. I would bet that everyone reading this overview, has a friend or relative, or they themselves are employed in some capacity in the healthcare industry. Have any of you stopped to consider what will happen to those people's jobs? If as proposed, most people are moved to a government run health insurance modeled after Medicaid, revenue to healthcare facilities, doctors offices, nursing homes, etc will drop dramatically. No one that currently provides healthcare even breaks even when they provide care to people on Medicaid. It is there as a safety net, and we all absorb the cost of providing care to the poor, as well we should. So if revenue drops dramatically, what becomes of the nurse, the ward clerk, the radiology tech, the orderly, the secretary? How many small facilities will have to close because they cannot even break even? Will healthcare be limited to a few large impersonal facilities, run on a tight budget providing substandard care?
Let's move onto another aspect of the proposed healthcare reform ...rationing, which is inevitable under the proposed plan. How many of you reading this email has friend or relative or you yourself are a cancer survivor? What happens to the cancer patient who has to wait 6 months or more for surgery or chemo? Survival rates in the US are significantly higher than countries with nationalized healthcare, primarily because of the quality and promptness of care we receive. Which one of you or your friends or relatives is alive today because they received the proper care in a timely fashion? Who would you suggest we make wait for chemo or surgery...the one with the best chance of survival? What if your mother, wife, sister coworker is placed in that position? I find that a frightening idea. Right now, time is of the essence. Congress is considering this legislation NOW. It is being marked up in committee as I write this overview.
Please take a minute and call or write your Congressman and Senator. Tell them to defeat this legislation. NOW!!!Here is a link to a website to help you find out how to contact your congressman or senator. http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/We need healthcare reform, but not this 1,100 page piece of legislation, which few have even read, not in such haste, not on the backs of small businessmen and women. Let's take our time and make honest, helpful reforms that the majority of the American people could support.
Carroll Pawlikowski
Williamsport, PA
Editor's Note: Carroll is my sister who is the business manager for a private practice health care provider in north central Pennsylvania. This blog is her recent e-mail without edits. Enjoy!
(c) 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
States Face Fiscal Reality
States Face Fiscal Reality
California's income tax is the most progressive of all 50 states, with the second highest top rate (10.55%) after New York City's 12.62%. The Governor's revenue office calculates that between 50% and 55% of the income tax in the state comes from Kobe Bryant and the rest of the richest 1% of taxpayers.
This sounds like a liberal's tax paradise, but the "soak the rich" system has imploded on itself. As tax rates keep rising, more Californians move to places like Nevada and Texas where they can pay zero income tax, leaving Sacramento with fewer revenue sources. Moreover, the progressive rate structure means that California experiences more extreme gyrations in its revenues than any other state.
According to the finance & economics blog CalculatedRisk www.calculatedriskblog.com data from the Nelson Rockerfeller Institute of Government indicated that state government income tax collections for the first 4 months of 2009 is down by 26% as compared to 2008. At the NR Institute site www.rockinst.org you can click through to the full report on state income tax collections. Some highlights of the “Change in Personal Income Tax FY 2008 compared FY 2009” : The largest drop in Personal Income Tax (PIT) collections is Arizona at -54.9%. States with Personal Income Tax (PIT) that is more than 45% of the state tax base: New York (down 31.8%), California (down 33.8%), Massachusetts (down 28.5%), Oregon (down 27.0%), Connecticut (down 25.9%), Colorado (down 25.4%), Virginia (down 17%), and Georgia (down 20.9%). According to the NR Institute, estimated tax payments (first quarter 2009) were down by 30.4% (January through April), and these estimated tax payments were down by 41% in April 2009 (as compared to 2008). Arizona, Colorado, Indiana and New York had drops of 37% or more (comparing Jan to April 2009 to 2008 period).
According to a recent report by the National Conference of State Legislatures, “In comparing personal income tax collections through April 2009 to the latest estimate, more than half the states were below target.”3 This is particularly bad news for the states that rely most heavily on personal income tax. A number of states already have enacted or recommended increases in personal income tax rates and other revenue-raising steps such as reductions in tax credits. Such proposals would increase personal income tax collections by more than $7 billion in two states alone: $4.7 billion in California and $2.9 billion in Illinois.
So just how bad are the revenue shortfalls? Let’s look at Colorado, whose new budget year begins on July 1, 2009: The forecast, released Monday, showed the state with a budget deficit of $249 million for fiscal 2009, which ends June 30. State officials will need to borrow that much from the 2009-1010 budget, which will push the fiscal 2010 deficit to $384 million, according to the state forecast. www.gjsentinal.com Republican Minority Leaders Josh Penry predicted that the new FY 2010 budget would only be in balance for 45 days (based on May 6th legislative session ending, until the new budget year begins). The Democrat majority legislature in Colorado passed new taxes on hospitials (provider fee), transporations (vehicle registration) and revoked a seniors property tax exemption. But these tax increases will not be able to balance the Colorado budget. Only budget cuts will balance the budget.
In Arizona, the FY 2010 budget shortfall is estimated at $4 Billion, with the Democrat Governor’s office presently in at an impasse with the Republican controlled legislature over the FY 2010 budget. The GOP passed a FY 2010 budget on June 4th, but has delayed sending it to the Governor, who has said she’d veto it (and ask the voters to raise taxes). With the Governor asking the Arizona Supreme Court to intervene, the state may shut down state offices on next week, due to no budget for the next Fiscal Year.
How is your state doing? For a review of various states and their tax rates (personal income, property, sales tax, etc), the Retirement Living Information Center has a good summary plus “state by state” information: http://www.retirementliving.com/RLtaxes.html
In the meantime, the fiscal reality of an economic downturn is hitting the state governments (and local governments) hard. About the only answer left is to cut spending and programs, as raising taxes (which a number of states have enacted or will try to enact) may just contribute to additional taxpayers moving to more favorable states. You may want to consider Wyoming: No personal income tax, fuel taxes on 14 per gallon (New York is 42 cents!), a 1% sales tax and low property taxes.
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media. www.jasperwelch.org
Saturday, May 30, 2009
A New Era of Fiscal Irresponsibility
A New Era of Fiscal Irresponsibility
Since regaining control of Congress, the Democrats with the help of the newly elected spend & tax President, have been on a spending spree never seen before in America. The USA triple A bond rating is in jeopardy, as rating agencies are beginning to question the financial viability of the USA government, with looming debt and unfunded entitlement programs. While former Congresses and former Presidents are convenient targets to blame, the Democrats in Congress shoulder the responsibility for this current fiscal irresponsibility. For a graphic view of the problem, here is a web site that gives a visual of just how much trouble the US is in, given the misguided spend & tax approach the Democrats, with the signature support of President Obama have gotten us into: www.gop.gov/accountability
For some specifics on US government waste and lack of accountability, check out Citizens Against Government Waste www.cagw.org See the recent 2009 Congressional Pig Book, where over 10,000 Congressional earmarks are detailed, including the newer stealth earmarks, designed to circumvent taxpayer scrutiny.
In addition to the Federal government budget having problems, many of states are in dire financial straights. But they cannot borrow like the Federal government (probably a good thing) and must balance their budgets. For more detail on metrics for each state in the US, the US Census Bureau has some good statistics: www.census.gov/compendia/statab/rankings.html
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities www.cbpp.org the budget crises for state governments continues to worsen in 2009, but unlike the Federal government, they cannot borrow money to cover deficits.
Here is an insight from the Center: “ The vast majority of states cannot run a deficit or borrow to cover their operating expenditures. As a result, states have three primary actions they can take during a fiscal crisis: they can draw down available reserves, they can cut expenditures, or they can raise taxes. States already have begun drawing down reserves; the remaining reserves are not sufficient to allow states to weather a significant downturn or recession. The other alternatives — spending cuts and tax increases — can further slow a state’s economy during a downturn and contribute to the further slowing of the national economy, as well.”
The overview from the Center continues: “States are currently at the mid-point of fiscal year 2009 — which started July 1 in most states — and are in the process of preparing their budgets for the next year. Over half the states had already cut spending, used reserves, or raised revenues in order to adopt a balanced budget for the current fiscal year — which started July 1 in most states. Now, their budgets have fallen out of balance again. New gaps of $59 billion (some 9 percent of state budgets) have opened up in the budgets of at least 42 states plus the District of Columbia. These budget gaps are in addition to the $48 billion shortfalls that these and other states faced as they adopted their budgets for the current fiscal year, bringing total gaps for the year to 16 percent of budgets.”
According to recent Gallup poll, states such as Wyoming and Louisiana are in the best shape (energy related economies) whereas the higher tax states, those with housing bubbles and those related to financial markets (New York, New Jersey, California, Arizona) are in the worst shape. www.gallup.com
But some states are doing much better, during this economic downtown, according to Gallup polling and research. “In addition to South Dakota and the four oil-producing states mentioned above, other "best job market" states include oil states like North Dakota, those benefiting from coal like West Virginia, and farm states with comparatively good economies from ethanol and a strong commodities market like Nebraska. Financial-crisis states in the Northeast, including Rhode Island, Delaware, Vermont, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Maine are some of the "worst job market" states, as is the housing crash state of California.
The second quartile of "better job market" states includes those with comparatively better economies because they are also energy-related, like Alaska, and farm-related, like Kansas. Similarly, the second-worst quintile of "poor job market" states have economies damaged by the financial debacle, like New York; the manufacturing depression, like Ohio; and the housing disaster, like Arizona.”
For the higher income tax individuals, states like New York, Minnesota, New Jersey and California are raising taxes from 5% and 6% to rates at the 8% to 10% level. Combined with the new Obama ‘tax the rich plan’ to raise individual income taxes to 39%, high-income earner is looking at a 50% tax rate! The assumption from the “tax the rich” camp is that higher income earners will just stay put and be a bigger tax target. But there are nine states that may have the welcome mat that these higher income producers may want to step across to and end up with lower taxes.
So what states don’t have a state income tax: Alaska, New Hampshire, Tennessee, Florida, South Dakota, Washington, Nevada, Texas and Wyoming. www.irs.gov You may want to look at moving and/or retiring in one of these nine “no income tax” states as the California and New York type of high tax states look at raising the state income tax rates to the 10% level (or approaching the 50% combined Federal + state rate for the high tax states).
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Overspending Swells Federal Deficit in April 2009
Overspending Swells Federal Deficit in April 2009
What does massive government spending by the US government result it? The inability to even show a monthly surplus in April, the historical high point of tax collections during the fiscal year (October through September), reflects the out of control spending by the Federal Government. In fact the US treasury has not shown a negative monthly gap in April (spending vs. taxes collected) since 1983. Thanks to the ongoing economic downturn, combined to massive Federal spending authorized by Congress, first April monthly shortfall in 26 years was experienced in Washington DC. President Obama and the Congress Democrats appear to be determined to spend money US government doesn’t have, to fund programs we don’t need, that will cause increased taxes we don’t want.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States posted its first April deficit in 26 years, a record $20.91 billion shortfall as a deep recession caused revenues to collapse in the year's biggest tax collection month, the U.S. Treasury said on Tuesday.
The deficit, the first for April since a $3.3 billion gap in 1983 as the country emerged from a deep recession, was largely in line with forecasts from Wall Street economists polled by Reuters. It brought the deficit for the first seven months of fiscal 2009 to a record $802.29 billion after a major positive accounting adjustment for the government's bailout investments.
Receipts for April, normally the year's biggest revenue month due to the April 15 deadline for federal income tax filing, fell to $266.23 billion from $403.75 billion in April 2008. Both individual and corporate income tax payments fell sharply from a year earlier. But outlays set another April record, rising to $287.14 billion from $244.47 billion a year earlier. www.reuters.com
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Spending + Borrowing = Higher Taxes
Spending + Borrowing = Higher Taxes
This week, Kansas Republican Lynn Jenkins gave the GOP response to President Obama’s weekly presidential address: “The pace that Democrats in Congress and the White House are spending your tax dollars is simply staggering…know a thing or two about handling taxpayer dollars. I was the state treasurer in Kansas for six years before I came to Congress, and before that I practiced public accounting as a certified public accountant for nearly two decades.
So trust me when I say Washington’s books are a mess.
It’s quickly turning into a symbol of everything wrong with Washington, D.C. – unchecked spending, no accountability and oversight, and more and more debt piled onto our children and grandchildren. This week, we marked the president’s 100th day in office. And while, like most of you, I like the president personally, I think the Democrats’ first 100 days running Washington can be summed up in three words: spending, taxing, and borrowing.” http://lynnjenkins.house.gov/
If you have had enough of overspending, taxing and waste in Washington, DC and throughout the Federal government, the next TEA Party Tax day will be Saturday July 4th, as a TEA Party Day really near you. With US national debt at $11 Trillion and counting, the TEA party organizers are reporting that 574+ rallies against higher taxes, excess spending and bloated government are planned for July 4th 2009. What does TEA stand for? Taxed Enough Already! http://www.teapartyday.com/
So just how much are US Taxpayers paying, as a percentage of their annual income in Federal taxes? At the turn of the century, prior to income taxes at the Federal level, the US taxpayer burden was about 5% of gross income. Tax Freedom Day®, as calculated by the US Tax Foundation www.taxfoundation.org occured in late January of the year. By World War I, the US taxpayer burden was about 10% of gross income. With the passage of the Individual Income tax and World War II (plus the New Deal), the US taxpayer burden rose to about 25% by the end of WWII. It remained steady and rose slightly to top 30% by 1969. It fell slightly during the Regan years (ranged between 29% and 31%), and then peaked again at a post WWII high of 33% at the end of the Clinton era. The Bush tax cuts eased the US taxpayer burden back down to 29%, before slowly climbing back to 31% prior to the Obama election. Here is the Tax Freedom Day® detailed history and tax law details: http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/sr165.pdf
Where did Tax Freedom Day® come from? It was conceived in 1948 by Florida businessman Dallas Hostetler. He originated the concept, calculations and copyrighted the intellectual property. Upon his retirement in 1971, he deeded the intellectual property (IP) to the National Tax Foundation.
So when is National Tax Freedom Day® in 2009? It occurred on April 13th. But if you add the deficit spending accumulated by the US Government (now at $11 Trillion), it will take American taxpayers until about June 1st to pay for the ongoing and accumulated cost of the US government.
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Tea Party Movement Gains Momentum
Tea Party Movement Gains Momentum
Of course, what’s interesting about the Tea Party movement, whatever its success, is that it is pretty much about what it says it is - lower taxes and less government spending. A lot of people, Republican and Democrat, are concerned about our escalating debt and what this might mean for future generations. This is clearly a serious subject for serious discussion from whatever side of the issue you fall out on, but… no matter… the moment something gains momentum out comes the derangement crowd. In a certain way, it’s a sign of success. Roger Simon http://pajamasmedia.com
Taxed Enough Already (TEA) information can be found at http://taxdayteaparty.com (Be patient with URL, as the server is getting double duty on US Tax deadline day!) The web site has a state-by-state “find a tea party in your state” list of cities that the grassroots movement has sprung up in, and where the Tea Party (round 2) will be held. In this blog, we posted about the original Rick Santelli (CNBC business reporter) on his ‘rant and rave’ about higher gov’t spending and too much government, and his call for a Chicago Tea Party (March 3rd post). On February 27th, a number of 1st round Tea Party protests and rallies were held. Now the second round is planned for US Tax day: the April 15th deadline to pay your 2008 income taxes.
In Colorado, Tea Party events are to be held in Colorado Springs, Craig, Delta, Denver, Durango, Loveland, Montrose, Grand Junction, Fort Collins, Pueblo, Steamboat Springs, Walsenburg and Woodland Park. (Blogger note: Boulder and Aspen are absent from list. Do the fine residents of these towns really think all is well, and taxes are too low?)
In New Mexico, Tea Party events are to be held on April 15th in Artesia, Albuquerque, Alamogordo, Carlsbad, Clovis, Farmington, Hobbs, Las Cruces, Roswell, Ruidoso, Santa Fe, Silver City and Taos.
Meanwhile the political left is trying their level best to discount, diminish and dumb down the Tea Party political movement. In fact at the Huffington Post, “citizen journalists” can sign up to cover the Tea Parties: “The Huffington Post wants to have citizen journalists at as many of these events as possible. If you think you'd be interested in attending one of the Tea Parties and reporting back to us with dispatches, photos, or video, click here to sign up. We'll contact you shortly with further instructions.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com
We’ll contact you shortly with further instructions? From whom? To really cover the Tea Party events, or just try to discount this grass roots American movement?
Back to the Tea Party movement. Many Americans, from the political left and right, Republican & Democrat, independent and other political parties are alarmed as the massive US Government spending, expansion of Federal programs coming from Washington DC and the Congressional appetite for more spending, more taxes and more government “top down” solutions. Thus the Tea Party movement.
On April 14th, at the National Press Club http://npc.press.org the Citizens Against Government Waste http://www.cagw.org gave their annual press conference on the 2009 Pig (pork) Book. This well researched document (available from the web site) details wasteful US government spending and pork. While it is disappointing for taxpayers to read, the annual Pig Book details the members of Congress and their pork spending ways. You can find the “Porker of the Year” and the other details on the big spenders in the Congress.
Let’s look at what the wasteful government spending leads to: Higher taxes at the local, state and Federal level. In 2008, the “Cost of Government Day” was July 16th. According to Citizens Against Government Waste, “Cost of Government Day for 2008 is July 16. Americans now work more than half of the year 197 days to pay their share of the cost of government with 84 of those days due to federal spending alone. This year, the average American will need to work an additional 16 days out of the year to pay off his or her cost of government compared to 2000 and four days compared to last year.”
Will the massive spending in 2009 push the “Cost of Government Day” into August?
If you are tired of more government programs, irresponsible spending and inevitable tax increases, we’ll see you tomorrow at the Tea Party event near you.
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org
Thursday, April 9, 2009
The Other (GOP) Federal Budget
The Other (GOP) Federal Budget
The Democrat Majority in the US House and US Senate passed the US Federal FY2010 budget, without one Republican member voting for it, and 20 “blue dog Democrats” voting against it. $3.6 Trillion of largess, earmarks (8,500 of them), increased social spending and decreased military spending. And a structural deficit in the US budget due to overspending by Congress of will be laid at the feet of our children and their children. And, despite promises of only “taxing the rich”, over time the Congress will raise taxes on all American’s, just to cover the new government programs, spending and interest on debt.
So what was alternative budget to the massive Democrat Federal budget, as put forth by the Republicans?
Answering President Obama's challenge for critics to present alternatives, the House Republicans have offered a responsible budget blueprint that:
+Borrows $3.6 trillion less than the President's budget;
+Would create $23,000 less debt per household than the President's budget;
+Keeps federal spending just above 20 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP)—the same level as before the recession;
+Avoids all tax increases and even simplifies the overly complex tax code;
+Includes a temporary moratorium on earmarks; and
+Begins reforming the unsustainable costs of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm2377.cfm
The House Republican alternative rejects all tax increases. It would permanently extend the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, as well as the AMT patch. It would also finally reform the complex income tax code by allowing individuals the choice of opting into a simplified tax system with a 10 percent marginal tax rate on incomes below $100,000 and a 25 percent marginal tax rate on incomes above $100,000. It would also encourage economic growth by reducing the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent and suspending capital gains taxes through 2010. From the Heritage Foundation www.heritage.org
Let’s compare the sensible Republican alternative (that unfortunately was defeated by the Democrat majority in the US House in early April 2009) to what is being predicted by the Heritage Foundation of the US tax system in heading higher and by 2050 will be like the high tax countries in Europe:
According to the CBO’s long-run forecast in December 2005, federal taxes under current law will rise from 18.3 percent of GDP to nearly 19 percent within five years and reach almost 24 percent of GDP by 2050. This means that the federal tax burden on Americans, as a proportion of income, will increase by almost one-fourth. When state and local taxes are included, the U.S. tax burden will be comparable to the burden in today’s slow-growth Europe.
From the Heritage Foundation: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1957.cfm
So while the Dems in Congress are claming to be moving to Pay-Go (paying for government programs as you go), what is really happening with a $3.6 Trillion budget and projected $1 Trillion deficits per year is this:
Expand US Government programs by spending money we don’t have, so we’ll borrow it from the rest of the world, to spend it on programs that expand the cost, scope and reach of government, which in turn will raise the public debt and desperate politicians in Congress looking to increase taxes on all Americans to pay for it.
Thus, we are heading towards being more like the country of Greece, whose debt as a country is forecast to exceed 100% of its Gross Domestic Product (the US public debt is $6.4 Trillion, which is about 42% of the US GDP). Greece’s financial problem is that their biggest economic burden is interest on their public debt. And Greece has been remanded by the European Commission to keep their continued deficit spending below 3% of GDP. The US budget deficit (just from the official FY 2010 budget) is 1.2 Trillion, or 8% of the US GDP. However, it is now projected at $1.8 Trillion, which is 12% of US GDP. No wonder France and Germany are lecturing the US on overspending, deficits and reining in government spending.
So where is Greece today? At a standstill, as a nationwide public strike over public sector pay and job losses has brought the country to a standstill Wall Street Journal, Page A11, April 3, 2009 As for a public stimulus by the Greek government? They can’t, as they ran out of money and the EU mandated “3% of GDP budget deficit spending cap” precludes the government from spending money.
Does the US want to become a permanent debtor nation, weakened by financial irresponsibility in Congress due to overspending, overreaching government programs and higher taxes? Under Obama and the Democrats in Congress, the US becoming subject to those countries, banks and individuals who hold US debt and leverage over us. Is that what a free, financially responsible and independent America should be doing? For more and more Americans, the answer is No!
© 2009, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org