Re-Election & Realism

    A divided country politically, with changing demographics and $6 Billion in election spending, results in both a re-election of marginally popular President and a divided US Congress.    For the GOP challenger Mitt Romney, too many items in his campaign didn't add up.  Mr. Romney ran a noble and spirited campaign, but the Democrat and "willing media" smear job proved to be defining.   A good man trashed for the purpose of re-election of the post-modern guy from Chicago.  However, it must be said that the GOP muddled the message of limited government, fiscal responsibility and personal responsibility.  Thus, the final Presidential result favored the better candidate and organization.

     For the incumbent President, the Obama machine used technology, a well organized ground game, a complicent media funded by $1 Billion in campaign monies, to roll up victories in a majority of the swing states (including Florida, Ohio and Virginia).  So congratulations to President Obama!  As a member of the loyal opposition, I'm impressed with the Obama victories across the swing states.   However, I'm deeply disappointed in the negative Democrat campaign tactics, the Mainstream News Media (MSM) and the fact that our Republican party tripped and stumbled on our own accord.

    So now what?    The GOP majority in the US House of Representatives, lead by Speaker Boehner is the only elected body standing in the way of re-elected President.     Of the three leaders (Leader Reid, President Obama, Speaker Boehner), the best and most skilled negotiator is Speaker Boehner.   The meanest of the three, is Leader Reid, who is willing to bend, avoid and skirt US Senate rules for the Majority purpose, if he can.  And the least experienced in governing and negotiating is the President.   Sure, he is an excellent campaigner and has run two successful Presidential campaigns.   This is no small feat.    The problem is in the President's limited ability to govern with a bipartisan approach.    

    But there are two other factors, with will impact our future politics in America.    One is the fact that 2/3 of the states will be governed by Republican elected executives.  These are popular and conservative reformers who are leading the experiments in US democracy at the state level.  And for some period of time, the US Supreme Court is split with both a liberal and conservative wing, that can still backstop the US Constitution to some extent.  The Obamacare 5-4 favorable ruling, although soundly criticized by conservatives (as for they Ok'd individual mandate), also included a "states right" ruling that the Federal government could not use withholding of Medicare dollars as leverage on the states who choose not to be forced to fund Obamacare with Medicare.   

    The biggest factor is that the President and his Democrat supporters now own it.   The weak economy, wobbly health care, and foreign unrest are the Democrats problem to solve.   No longer can a former President (Bush) be blamed, GOP presidential candidates made fun of, nor can blaming others for weak economic situations in the US.  They'll have to work with the loyal opposition to resolve the problems that both own and will be expected to have viable solutions for.  

Immediate budget challenges and "fiscal cliff" impacts will require bi-partisan leadership to resolve.    The President and his leadership abilities will be exposed as what they really are.   The slash and burn negative campaigning, the pandering to special interest groups, the funding of cronies and ideologues that have proven effective in Presidential campaigning...will simply not work in spirited bi-partisan negotiations.    For example, when the Democrats controlled the US House in 2009 and cooperated with the President and the US Senate in "cramming down" Obamacare without any Republican support, little did the Democrat leadership ever dream that when it came time for implementation of Obamacare in 2013 and 2014, the Boehner lead Republicans would be in charge.  Oops!  

   There is much more to discuss, but this post-election review will get us started.

(c) 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org    

Romney Schools Obama

Romney Schools Obama

It was time to call the debate for Romney before it was halfway done.  A weak President and poorly prepared Barack Obama was unable to hold his own with challenger Mitt Romney in their first debate.  For the first time in four years, the President was actually challenged and called on the carpet for his failed policies and inept attempts to explain away Obama-ville.  The Main Stream Media (MSM) pass and Obama’s fear to give and take press conferences created the White House cocoon effect.  Simply put, the President wasn’t ready for a prime time debate with a worth opponent. So exactly what happened in the first of three Presidential debates?

            Barack Obama was faced with five factors that he either underestimated or misunderstood.   First, there we no teleprompters to convey the answers or script to the President.   He actually had to think and respond for himself.   And he struggled with his responses.  Secondly, there were no friendly members of the press to lob softball questions or cover for his weak answers.    This wasn’t The View, where Obama characterized himself as “eye candy”.    This was live fire; with Jim Lehrer delivering questions and follow up with true journalistic rigor.  Thirdly, the President was not prepared for spirited debate and was unable to defend his failed policies.    When he tried for the third time to pin a $5 trillion dollar “supposed” tax cut on Mitt Romney, the GOP challenger restated that the Obama spin was simply not true.  The fourth factor was that the President was unable to “walk out of the press conference” when the heat was turned up with the hard questions from the moderator.   He had to stay at the podium during the Presidential debate for a long hour and a half.   Finally, the President had to face reality, as compared to the mythical life and “media created” narrative that he has lived for the past four years.   Your actions and decisions as President do matter.   The US economy really isn’t firing on all cylinders.    Truth is brighter than lies.  And Barack Obama was exposed by the reality of prepared opponent in Mitt Romney that didn’t back down. 

            Meanwhile, Mitt Romney came to the first debate well prepared.    And he well schooled in the policy debate that is before the America people.   He laid out his 5-point plan with clarity.   He challenged the President on every point, indicating his approach that is more citizen and private sector driven.    He was able to pin “trickle down government” on the President, whose every answer involved the government spending more money (investments) or paying more of our fair share (raising taxes).   When the President tried the “big oil” tax break spin, Romney fired back with Obama’s history of committing multiple millions of US government monies spent on “green companies” that have failed in the marketplace.  When the President tried to classify Donald Trump as a small business person, Romney correctly explained what raising taxes on the “rich” actually negatively impacts many small business owners as well.  A weak President attempting to use campaign and class warfare rhetoric was exposed.  Mr. Romney was direct, concise and well organized in his responses to questions and he successfully challenged the President.   He looked the audience and the President in the eye.   All that Obama could do was shuffle his feet, look down at his notes, and wish that the debate was over.  

            Many commentaries have been written about the first debate, and it is clear that this was one of Romney’s finest moments in contrast with a fading Barack Obama.  The Democrat spin machine struggled for traction, as Al Gore blamed the poor debate performance the “altitude” in Denver.  Really?   What would have happened if the debate was in Aspen, Colorado?  Or Telluride, CO?  The president would have passed out!  The New York Times (never a fan of someone from Chicago, as compared to Hillary Clinton who hails as the Senator from New York) is running the “empty podium and chair” cartoon on their front cover.  It shows Romney debating the empty chair, or empty suit as some have indicated.  Essentially, Romney schooled Obama in the first debate.

            Well-known conservative columnist Victor Davis Hansen summarized the debate this way:  http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/anatomy-of-a-disastrous-debate-performance    Debate number two is fast approaching.    Romney will be well prepared.   Who knows if Obama will show up?

© 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media  www.jasperwelch.org

Skewing the Presidential Polls

Have you ever wondered about the Presidential polls?   How they are determined and what do the numbers really mean?  And what "secret sauce" do they use for likely voters, turnout, and independent voter trends?  In the 2012 Presidential race and polling the narrative (interpretation of the polls by MSM) is that the Presidential sweepstakes has been tied, with Obama now pulling away.   But there is a problem with this pro-Obama story line that is being parroted by the Main Stream Media (MSM).   Here is an article on how polls can be skewed:

http://www.examiner.com/article/is-the-latest-washington-post-abc-poll-skewed-for-obama

Here is a polling web site that is adjusting for "likely voters" vs. registered voters.   The website Unskewed is using different voting trend models, including the higher number of registered Republicans in 2012 vs. 2008 and the historical trends suggesting that independents are breaking towards a more conservative vote:

http://unskewedpolls.com/

And here is the backgrounder on Scott Rasmussen from Rasmussen reports, who has been the most accurate pollster in the past 10 years, including the first to predict that Scott Brown (R-Massachusettes) could upset the Democrat in the recent US Senate race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports

So, who are you going to believe?    I'd go with the actual voters this November.   But in the meantime, I'd watch Rasmussen and Unskewed out of the corner of my eye, in spite of the steady drumbeat by the MSM that polls are showing Obama more favorably (due to their Democrat skew).

(c) 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org  

Obama: Incomplete Answer

Paul Ryan Answers the Questions

As the Main Stream Media (MSM) goes after the Romney-Ryan GOP ticket in the final 2 months of the Presidential campaign - some challenging questions are being asked.   If you search www.youtube.com for Paul Ryan speeches, you'll find a fresh approach to answering questions from the media.   Mr. Ryan actually answers questions.    This compares to the Obama approach of dodge the question, change the subject and then blame others for the present problems.  Thus week the question "du jour" has been the famous line from the presidential debate between "one-term President Jimmy Carter" and the challenger, Governor Ronald Reagan:  "Are you better off now than four years ago?".   The Governor of Maryland said "No" earlier this week, until the Democrat party operatives called and told him to "change the answer", which he has dutifully been trying to do since giving his original honest answer.  But the bet answer was from President Obama, who was asked in Colorado Springs to grade his performance with the US economy and responded "incomplete".   Really?

Here is how Paul Ryan responded to the tough round of questions from the CBS news team (who are in Charlotte, NC at the Democrat convention).
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/09/04/paul_ryan_four_years_into_a_presidency_and_its_incomplete.html

Only an academic or silver tongued lawyer would answer the "Are you better off" question as Barak Obama did: "incomplete".    So he dodged the question, attempted to change the subject, and then (as he has been prone to do) blamed others for the poor economy.

The transcript of Obama's "incomplete" grade that he gave himself on the economy:

Dianne Derby: Your party says you inherited a bad situation. You've had three and a half years to fix it. What grade would you give yourself so far for doing that?

President Obama: You know I would say incomplete...but what I would say is the steps that we have taken in saving the auto industry, in making sure that college is more affordable andinvesting in clean energy and science and technology and research, those are all the things that we are going to need to grow over the long term.

http://www.kktv.com/home/headlines/11-News-Anchor-Dianne-Derby-168414096.html

So after 3 1/2 years on the job, and the Presidents's policies are not working, he gives himself a grade of "incomplete"?    Looks like it is time to elect a new President!

Sharpening the Pencils & the Debate (VP Ryan)

The selection of Wisconsin Representative Paul Ryan as the Vice Presidential candidate by GOP nominee Mitt Romney changes the Presidential campaign.  While the VP nominee is rarely is a game changer in an election for President, this time around may be different.    To date, the Presidential race has lacked the real debate on the issues facing America:  the US economy, lack of jobs (8%+ unemployment), entitlement reform, limited government and the role of the private sector.    And the campaign debate has failed to address the signature legislative "cram down" by the Obama administration and the government-minded Democrats:  the proposed repeal of ObamaCare by a Mitt Romney administration.
     As the VP candidate, Ryan adds intellectual acumen, budget expertise, youth and the ability to carry the conservative message without apology.   Take the time to pull up some YouTube video clips of Mr. Ryan in action.   Or watch the time that Representative Ryan sliced and diced ObamaCare in his exchange with the President at the joint legislative & executive branch meeting at the White House.   Obama was unable to counter or respond.
     As the Republican Presidential candidate, Romney has changed the subject to the real issues and the "boys from Chicago" will be unable to keep changing the subject away from the obvious.   This President and his liberal expanding of the federal government has failed the American people.   The debate about the true future of limited government vs. unlimited government for the United States now begins in earnest.

(c) 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media,  www.jasperwelch.org

John Stossel: ObamaCare Speech Decoded

John Stossel, commentator and news anchor with Fox Business News, gives us a point-by-point translation (decoding) of the President's hollow victory speech on Obamacare ruling by the US Supreme Court.  Obama-speak and the truth about ObamaCare continue to diverge.

http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/stossel/blog/2012/06/29/obamas-victory-speech-translated

Obama-nomics simply don't work!

A recent Investors Business Daily highlights the failures of Obama-nomics.    The lack of economic results due to the lack of Presidential leadership and poorly conceived policies is proven out in the economic metrics:

The Obama Record: May's weak jobs report further confirms the president's policies are failing to help the economy. This is, indeed, the worst recovery since the Depression.

Negative superlatives associated with this presidency keep piling up. The toll so far:

• The share of Americans who've been out of work a long time — now at 42% of the unemployed — is the highest since the Great Depression (source: Labor Department).

• The proportion of the civilian working-age population actually working, at 58%, is the smallest since the Carter era (Labor Department).

• Growth in nonfarm payroll jobs since the recovery began in June 2009 is the slowest of any comparable recovery since World War II (Hoover Institution).

• The rate of new business startups — the engine of job growth — has plunged to an all-time low of 7.87% of all businesses (Census Bureau).

• 3 in 10 young adults can't find jobs and live with their parents, highest since the 1950s (Pew Research).

For complete Business Investors Daily website coverage:  http://www.investors.com

• 54% of bachelor's degree-holders under the age of 25 are jobless or underemployed, the highest share in decades (Northeastern University).

• Black teen unemployment, now at 37%, is near Depression-era highs (Labor Department).

• Almost 1 in 6 Americans are now poor — the highest ratio in 30 years — and the total number of poor, at 49.1 million, is the largest on record (Census).

• The share of Hispanics in poverty has topped that of blacks for the first time, 28.2% to 25.4% (Census).

• The number of Americans on food stamps — 45 million recipients, or 1 in 7 residents — also is the highest on record (Congressional Budget Office).

• Total government dependency — defined as the share of Americans receiving one or more federal benefit payments — is now at 47%, highest ever (Hoover).

• The share of Americans paying no income tax, at 49.5%, is the highest ever (Heritage Foundation, IRS).

• The national homeownership rate, now at 65.4%, is the lowest in 15 years (Census).

• The 30-point gap between black and white Americans who own their own homes is the widest in two decades and one of the widest on record (Census).

• Federal spending, now at 23.4% of GDP, is the highest since WWII (CBO).

• Excluding defense and interest payments, spending is the highest in American history, at 17.6% of the economy (First Trust Economics).

• The federal debt, at 69% of GDP, is the highest since just after WWII (CBO).

• The U.S. budget deficit, now at 9.5% of the economy, is the highest since WWII (CBO).

• U.S. Treasury debt has been downgraded for the first time in history, meaning the U.S. government no longer ranks among risk-free borrowers (S&P).

This is what Obamanomics has wrought. Fiscal promiscuity. Trickle-up poverty. Shared misery.

Source:  Investors Business Daily  http://news.investors.com/IBDEditorials.aspx 

Previous Obama supporter switches

President Obama is losing support each day, as former Democrats and supporters look for an alternative for President in 2012.    Here is the latest former Congressman (D-Alabama) to switch parties and become a Republican.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/30/former_dem_rep_artur_davis_explains_why_he_is_becoming_a_republican.html

Former Democratic Congressman Artur Davis once supported candidate Obama, but he explains that what he voted for in 2008, isn't what America has seen in Obama's 1st term in office.    Now he's a Republican looking at the better alternative, the Republican nominee, Mitt Romney.

(c) 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org

MainStreamMedia gets one Right!

It is not often that the Main Stream Media (MSM) gets a story right.   Don Lemon, a Cable News Network (CNN) reporter on Monday April 23rd delivered an excellent "No Talking Points" monolog.
Watch it here:http://mrctv.org/videos/has-cnns-don-lemon-turned-obama

In the story on CNN, normally a cable news network that acts as a spokesperson(s) network for President Obama, Mr. Lemon actually pulls together the "name & blame" approach taken by the White House and lays the issue on the line (to the President).    Essentially, quit blaming the former President (Bush) for issues that have occurred on your watch, Mr. President (Obama).    What a novel concept:   accountability!

(c) 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org  

Senate Democrats AWOL on Budget

US Senate Democrats, who serve (skip) on the Senate Budget committee, have coordinated with the Democrat leader Harry Ried (D-Nevada) to take NO action on a budget mark-up for the last 3 years.   No action, no budget no show.   This image from Hot Air http://hotair.com  and C-SPAN clip say it all.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/19/picture-of-the-day-democrats-not-at-work

US Senator Sessions (R-Alabama) indicates that he'd actually mark up a budget and get it passed, if the voters give the Republicans the opportunity to do their job.

(c) Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org

Spending Money Because It's OPM

Spending Money Because It’s OPM

“I remember when liberals were liberal with their own money”  is a quote attributed to Will Rogers.   Modern day “spend & tax” liberals, such as President Obama are spending the US taxpayers money without restraint because it is “Other Peoples Money”.     We’ll tax other people (especially the rich), because a) they have too much money (class warfare), b) we as liberals (in government) know how to spend it better than you, c) if we don’t have it in the US Treasury now, we’ll just borrow more for taxpayers to pay back later.    Former US Senator Bill Armstrong (R-Colorado) stated the appetite for US government spending by Congress this way, “Congress is spending money like a drunken sailor, the trouble is, a sailor is spending his own money!”

    Even the moderate to liberal Politico is noting the long term and large spending patterns by the Obama Administration. The federal debt held by the public would still nearly double again from $10.1 trillion at the end of 2011 to $18.8 trillion at the end of 2022. For the current fiscal year ending Sept. 30, CBO is now projecting a shortfall of $1.3 trillion. In fiscal 2013, the deficit will still hover near the $1 trillion mark — about $977 billion. And while it will fall to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2017, it then begins to grow again to 3 percent of GDP by 2022.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74109_Page2.html#ixzz1pTnvuOln

The Heritage Foundation has an excellent link, with the US government revenues and spending graphically portrayed in easy to understand charts:

            http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook

Under the Obama Administration, Federal spending per household jumped from $25,000 per year (per household) to $30,000 per year.   It had moderated under a GOP House of Representatives (where the spending bills originate) to $29,401 per household (per year).

            The 30-year average tax burden (Federal tax rate) from 1981 to 2010 has been about 18%.    The highest average rate was 20% (in year 2000), just prior to President Bush being elected.  The projection for the next decade is for average Federal income tax rates to rise from the historical average of 18% to nearly 25%, if Federal spending and taxation are not constrained by Congress and the elected President.

            Presently, the lower (bottom half) of US taxpayers only pay 2.7% of the total income taxes collected by Uncle Sam.  Whereas the top 5% of income earner (US taxpayers earning over $159,000 per year) are paying nearly 60% of the income taxes collected.   The top 1% of income producers (those who create jobs, wealth and economic activity for our country as a whole) are paying 40% of the income taxes collected.  

            So let’s tax the rich, as per the “class warfare” manta of President Obama!   Not so fast.   Our history in modern America would suggest the contrary: 

            “The most dramatic decline in the top individual income tax rate, from 70 percent to 28 percent, occurred during the Reagan Administration, during which tax receipts remained relatively constant as a share of the economy.”  Heritage Foundation

            http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/income-tax-receipts

And what will be the result of this overspending, over the next 10 years?   The Heritage Foundation projects that our US Federal deficit (if spending is unchecked) will reach 100% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 2022.  Then it is “Hello Greece, or Portugal or Italy”! http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/national-debt-skyrocket

What can we do?   Tell Congress to stop the US government overspending.   Back the Paul Ryan budget bills and policy changes.   Vote for fiscal conservatives, who have voting records that actually show “stop the brutal spending” votes.   President Obama’s budget numbers show the US debt as a percentage of GDP rising from 40.3% to to 87.4% from 2008 to 2020.   Sit back and go with the “wasteful spending money” flow, and we’ll watch our beloved America go broke.  Or stand up, and vote the "over spenders" out of office.    Here’s the whole set of charts:

            http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/contents

© 2012, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org 

Victor Davis Hansen on 2012 Election

In a recent Pajamas Media TV interview of Victor Davis Hansen by Roger Simon, the well know conservative writer, scholar and historian gives his opinion of President Obama and the likely debates surrounding the 2012 Presidential race.  

For the full interview, go to Pajamas TV

http://pjmedia.com/blog/pjtv-victor-davis-hanson-on-2012-and-the-state-of-conservatism

For the rest of the conservative web site http://pjmedia.com  

Rick Perry Enters the Presidential Race

It's official:  Rick Perry, the Republican Governor of Texas has entered the 2012 Presidential race.  Over the weekend, from a starting point in South Carolina, the popular Texas governor burst upon the national stage.    Following his announcement, Governor Perry traveled to New Hampshire and then to Iowa to meet voters in the heartland.

Here is his interview with Fox News  http://www.therightscoop.com/perry-i-hope-im-obamas-worst-nightmare

With President Obama's poll numbers sliding below the 40% level, and (according to Rassmussen Reports) his negative spread is -22.       So with the Republican field flexing it's muscle, and the loyal opposition (the GOP is surging) taking on the Main Stream Media (MSM) and the Democrat in the White House, Governor Perry's entrance into the competitive field make it that much more interesting.

For more on Rassmussen Reports:  http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Take some time to check out each GOP candidate for President.  And contrast their message for American with the worn out liberal approach being taken by President Obama.     Too bad we can't move the general election up to November 2011!

(c) Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media   www.jasperwelch.org  

Senator Rubio plan talk about the Budget

Plain talk from US Senator Rubio (R-Florida), from the floor of the US Senate on July 30, 2011:

And here’s the way I would describe it the United States of America more or less -- these are rough numbers but they’re accurate – spends about $300 billion a month. It has $180 billion a month that comes to the federal government through taxes and other sources of revenue and that means that in order to meet its bills at the end of every month it needs to borrow $120 billion.

“Now, for much of the history of this country, there have been increases in the debt limit and the ability to borrow money. But what has happened over the last few years is that it's no longer a routine vote because the people who give us our credit rating are saying too much of the money that you spend every month is borrowed and we want you to show us how over the next ten years you are going to borrow less as a percentage of what you spend.

“And so that's why, for years, where the debt limit was routine vote, it no longer can be. It’s not something that was made up in some conservative think tank. But the reality that we cannot continue to borrow 40% to 41% of every penny that the government spends has brought us to this point.

“So you would think that seeing that, our government and our leaders here in both parties would react to that immediately and work on it.

“And I've heard lot of talk today about delaying tactics and delaying votes. I would argue to you that this issue has been delayed at least for the last two and a half years.

“In the two years before I even came here, this chamber neither proposed nor passed a budget. It is a startling figure that for the last two years this government has operated without a budget. So think about that. Two years have gone by without a budget. The first two years that the President was the president, no budgets.

Source: www.realclearpolitics.com  

Democrats Delay, GOP Moves Forward

From US Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) in the National Review online edition: 

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid chose tonight to delay, and not vote on his plan to raise the debt ceiling. Republicans requested over and over, on the Senate floor, to vote on the Reid plan tonight. The Congress needs to move past the Reid plan, which cannot pass the Senate, and cannot pass the House of Representatives. The Reid plan, full of gimmicks and budgetary tricks, hands the president another credit card to max out through his reelection — the biggest credit card in history.
      The plan Republicans support avoids default, cuts spending, caps future spending, and balances the budget. This approach is supported by 60 percent of Americans. With the Democrats’ latest delay on a real solution to our nation’s fiscal problems, they bring us closer to default. We have just four days left.
     America needs a credible plan for cutting spending. Instead of plans, they ask Americans to tweet #compromise while putting out slogans such as the “Boehner Drop.” This is not governing, this is politics as usual, and the American taxpayer foots the bill.
     Without a serious effort to cut debt and prevent default, President Obama will be presiding over the first-ever downgrade of our nation’s creditworthiness. This will raise interest rates, a “debt tax,” on all Americans, which may cost by some estimates $100 billion a year. An anxious market has already lost over 530 points this week.
    While Republicans offer solutions week after week, it’s the default Democrats who say no time and time again. Democrats were the only ones talking about a government shutdown during the debate over funding the government just a few short months ago. Now they are repeating that same playbook of scare tactics and electoral politics, with much higher stakes: our nation’s economy, an economy that we found out on Friday is not growing nearly fast enough to reduce unemployment. Democrats, if serious about avoiding a rating downgrade, will quickly move past the Reid plan. And the Congress should move forward with a plan that strengthens our financial future.

For more from the National Review online:   http://www.nationalreview.com  

Boehner: Put Something on the Table!

 In a speech of support before his fellow members of the US House of Representatives, Speaker of the House John Boehner laid out his case for "Cut, Cap & Balance".     The President and majority of the US Senates (aka, Democrats) have yet to lay out a plan to go forward, and the US Senate has not passed a Federal budget in 800 days (while the Democrats have been in the majority).   As the Speaker said on Friday night:  "Put something on the table!"  

"I can tell you that I have worked with the President and the administration since the beginning of this year to avoid being in this spot. I have offered ideas. I've negotiated. Not one time, not one time did the administration ever put any plan on the table. All they would do was criticize what I put out there. I stuck my neck out a mile to try to get an agreement with the President of the United States. I stuck my neck out a mile and I put revenues on the table in order to try to come to an agreement to avert us being where we are. But a lot of people in this town can never say yes. A lot of people can never say yes. This House has acted and it is time for the administration and time for our colleagues across the aisle put something on the table!" Speaker John Boehner said on the House floor late Friday afternoon (7.29.11, US House of Representatives, during the US debt ceiling debate).

Our 10 Trillion Dollar Man

The recent blog by Victor Davis Hanson, entitled "our ten trillion dollar man".

http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/our-ten-trillion-dollar-man/

Straight Talk from Speaker Boehner

As we watch the Main Stream Media (MSM) and the liberal press try to spin the debt crisis, here is some straight talk from Speaker of the House John Boehner.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/07/25/boehner_balanced_approach_means_spend_more_you_pay_more.html

The US House, lead by Speaker Boehner, is where all spending, tax and revenue bills originate from. The House is the only legislative body that has passed a bill, which is called "Cut, Cap and Balance". Simplly put, cut the US Federal spending, cap the debt ceiling and balance the budget. Not very complicated. But for spend & tax liberals in Washington, and President Obama, they are unwilling to look at real reform, real spending cuts and reducing the size of the bloated Federal government.

Call your US Senators today, whose last action on the budget debate was to table action on "Cut, Cap and Balance", and simply kick the can down the road. The Democrat US Senators from New Mexico (Udall, Bingaman) and Colorado (Bennett, Udall) all voted to table the bill. Clearly it's time to let our Senators know that we are disappointed in their big spending ways.

(c) 2011, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media www.jasperwelch.org

Governor Tim Pawlenty Announces for President

The Republican field of candidates for President of the US (POTUS) is geting sorted out.   With Haley Barbour, Mitch Daniels, Donald Trump (really?), Mike Huckabee and probably a few others (in the next few months) OUT of the race, and the early announcers in the race for Prez (Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul), the newest official candidate is former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty.   Following on his heels will likely be former Utah Governor Huntsman.
Here is the Pawlenty pre-announcement video Palenty web announcement that appeared this weekend on the campaign website.   Tim's official announcement will come on Monday May 23rd in Iowa, the site of the early midwest GOP campaigning and early caucus results.

You'll note the Democrat leaning (or really biased) Main Stream Media (MSM) noting that the Republicans have a weak field and that there is not a front runner among them.     And Obama is raising lots of money and that he'll be hard to beat.    Wrong!    As John Sununu  (former US Senator from New Hampshire and contributor to the Boston Globe) aptly states in his recent editorial:

The New Hampshire primary isn’t about announcements or first impressions, and it will not be decided in May or June. With Daniels’s decision, the field may finally be set, but the long march has barely begun.

Primaries don’t repeat themselves, but as the saying goes, sometimes they rhyme. 2012, like 1996, features a Democratic president who suffered big mid-term losses, a sluggish economy, and a wide-open Republican field. Right now, that’s something of a self-fulfilling prophecy: The field is open because most voters and activists have yet to commit to a candidate; they haven’t committed to a candidate because the field is still open.

With Daniels out, focus will fall on the trio of Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, and Jon Huntsman. They have all served as governor, won statewide elections, and can raise considerable campaign cash. They also all have big hurdles to overcome.

So let the candidates begin their long march through the early primary and caucus states.   In a Presidential race, it is like the Olympics.    It only happens every four years, it takes tremendous preparation and team efforts and the final victor may or may not be favored early.  And a good set of primary races will yeild a stronger GOP challenger to President Obama.     

(c) 2011, Jasper Welch, Four Corners Media, www.jasperwelch.org 

A Reasonable Approach to Fiscal Sanity

In a recent speech on the floor of the US Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnel (R-Kentucky) makes the case for fiscal disipline, and lays out the arguments (as made by the tea party) for cutting spending and getting the US Federal budget under fiscal control.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/31/sen_mcconnell_tea_party_has_had_overwhelmingly_positive_impact.html

Pretty plan English on what we need our elected official in Washington to do.